<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The problem with an SKX&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/</link>
	<description>The online watch &#38; accessories magazine brought to you by watch enthusiasts, for watch enthusiasts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=700#comment-398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-384&quot;&gt;Essemoar&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Steve. yes you&#039;re absolutely right - thanks - i&#039;ve updated the article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-384">Essemoar</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Steve. yes you&#8217;re absolutely right &#8211; thanks &#8211; i&#8217;ve updated the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Essemoar		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Essemoar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=700#comment-384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ben, love the article, but for your own information the 6R15 is actually the NE15 which is a step up from the 4R35 (NH35). It&#039;s got a better mainspring, and a longer power reserve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben, love the article, but for your own information the 6R15 is actually the NE15 which is a step up from the 4R35 (NH35). It&#8217;s got a better mainspring, and a longer power reserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Why did Seiko &#8216;Downgrade&#8217; the SKX? &#8211; Wristworthy		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why did Seiko &#8216;Downgrade&#8217; the SKX? &#8211; Wristworthy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=700#comment-346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Items in this article:New Seiko 5 Sports rangeRelated:The Problem with an SKX [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Items in this article:New Seiko 5 Sports rangeRelated:The Problem with an SKX [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-41</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 22:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=700#comment-41</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-39&quot;&gt;Peter Drysdale&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Peter. The turtle and samurai are both great watches and do offer a level of build quality above the SKX. They’re both great choices although the Samurai is more of a “marmite” watch - people either love it or hate it as it it untypically angular for Seiko. However the Turtle is almost universally loved. We loved spending time with both when we wrote the dawn grey article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-39">Peter Drysdale</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Peter. The turtle and samurai are both great watches and do offer a level of build quality above the SKX. They’re both great choices although the Samurai is more of a “marmite” watch &#8211; people either love it or hate it as it it untypically angular for Seiko. However the Turtle is almost universally loved. We loved spending time with both when we wrote the dawn grey article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Drysdale		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-problem-with-an-skx/#comment-39</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Drysdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 12:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=700#comment-39</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree on most of your points, however as a relatively new collector I chose to instead get an Orient Mako 2, which is around the same price as an SKX but the movement is hackable and hand winds. The crystal is still hardlex, but I think it&#039;s just as versatile as the SKX if not more. I know I&#039;m in the minority, but I think it has made me forego the SKX need most collectors have. If I were going to buy an entry level Seiko diver it would probably be either the Samurai or the Turtle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on most of your points, however as a relatively new collector I chose to instead get an Orient Mako 2, which is around the same price as an SKX but the movement is hackable and hand winds. The crystal is still hardlex, but I think it&#8217;s just as versatile as the SKX if not more. I know I&#8217;m in the minority, but I think it has made me forego the SKX need most collectors have. If I were going to buy an entry level Seiko diver it would probably be either the Samurai or the Turtle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
