<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Pro&#8217;s &#038; Cons of Watch Water Resistance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/</link>
	<description>The online watch &#38; accessories magazine brought to you by watch enthusiasts, for watch enthusiasts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 20:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-45</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=495#comment-45</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-44&quot;&gt;John Reed&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi John

The water resistance stated on the watch is the maximum that the manufacturer can be held accountable for which means if it does fail they will only cover it under warranty if it has been used within the ISO rating declared by the manufacturer (ISO22810 and ISO6425). However this doesn&#039;t stop the watch being built better than declared and Casio are one manufacturer who regularly exceed build better than they say. However if the water resistance of any watch fails it will only be covered by how the manufacturer &#039;warrants&#039; the watch by its design.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-44">John Reed</a>.</p>
<p>Hi John</p>
<p>The water resistance stated on the watch is the maximum that the manufacturer can be held accountable for which means if it does fail they will only cover it under warranty if it has been used within the ISO rating declared by the manufacturer (ISO22810 and ISO6425). However this doesn&#8217;t stop the watch being built better than declared and Casio are one manufacturer who regularly exceed build better than they say. However if the water resistance of any watch fails it will only be covered by how the manufacturer &#8216;warrants&#8217; the watch by its design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Reed		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-44</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=495#comment-44</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aged 13 I would swim ~2.5m down to the bottom of every swimming pool wearing my casio W-59B quartz watch (50m rated). 

I used the stopwatch underwater to time how long I could stay down there.

It never failed and that was despite me using the stopwatch and light many times over 2 years at the bottom of different pools (on different vacations) and showering with it still on daily.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aged 13 I would swim ~2.5m down to the bottom of every swimming pool wearing my casio W-59B quartz watch (50m rated). </p>
<p>I used the stopwatch underwater to time how long I could stay down there.</p>
<p>It never failed and that was despite me using the stopwatch and light many times over 2 years at the bottom of different pools (on different vacations) and showering with it still on daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-10</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=495#comment-10</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-9&quot;&gt;Tunokies&lt;/a&gt;.

I think that’s an excellent point! All too often people expect a watch to perform as well as it did the day it was purchased and while the rubber seals can be replaced, it’s a whole other story if the the metal surface has become compromised. This is why it’s really important to get the seals checked periodically.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-9">Tunokies</a>.</p>
<p>I think that’s an excellent point! All too often people expect a watch to perform as well as it did the day it was purchased and while the rubber seals can be replaced, it’s a whole other story if the the metal surface has become compromised. This is why it’s really important to get the seals checked periodically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tunokies		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-9</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tunokies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=495#comment-9</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The rating is only as good as the watches gaskets and sealing surfaces. A 20 year old 200m divers watch came to me recently after flooding. The seals were reasonably good but a sealing surface ( the inside of the case back) was pitted causing a bad seal. This was 316 stainless but had obviously lived all it&#039;s life in a very humid environment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rating is only as good as the watches gaskets and sealing surfaces. A 20 year old 200m divers watch came to me recently after flooding. The seals were reasonably good but a sealing surface ( the inside of the case back) was pitted causing a bad seal. This was 316 stainless but had obviously lived all it&#8217;s life in a very humid environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://www.wristworthy.uk/the-pros-cons-of-watch-water-resistance/#comment-8</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wristworthy.uk/?p=495#comment-8</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another great article Ben <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f44c.png" alt="👌" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great article Ben 👌</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
